Dear friend,
The riddle first, as the tradition demands. Back in the old town a long job inside a house was a kind of weather. It arrived, it was endured, it went, and afterwards the household spoke of it the way people speak of a winter, which is to say by its worst day and by nothing else whatever.
Two bricklayers in the same town, the same slaked lime and the same stock bricks in the same barrow.
The same farmhouse, the same cracked kitchen flue, the same nine days of work and the same nine pounds.
One of them did all nine days a little better than he had to.
One did eight of them exactly as he had to, and gave three hours to a single morning.
Same trade, same wall, same mortar, and the second man the one the parish sent for afterwards.
Which of them understood what a household actually keeps?
Hold your answer. Story time.
The Story
Two farmhouses in the parish wanted the same thing in the same autumn, in the town I have never named. A kitchen flue had cracked in each, the smoke was coming back down into the room, and the chimney breast had to be opened, taken down to the oven and built up again. Nine days apiece, nine pounds apiece, and two men of twenty years' standing.
The first bricklayer was the better workman, and that is worth saying plainly, because this is not a story about a lazy man. He struck his joints beautifully, and on a Friday evening with nobody watching he raked out two courses he was not satisfied with. The pointing behind the plaster of that kitchen is a credit to him to this day, and no living soul has ever seen it or ever will.
He opened the breast on the Monday and the fire went out, which it had to, and it stayed out five days while the brickwork went up and the mortar took. Nobody had said five. Nobody had said anything. That kitchen held the only fire in the house, and the kettle hung over nothing. The men came in from the fields at noon on the Tuesday to bread and cold bacon, and on the Wednesday the same, and the woman of the house stood among soot sheets with no means of boiling water and nowhere to put herself. By the Thursday she was in tears over an ordinary piece of building work being done entirely correctly by a decent man.
The second bricklayer did one thing the first did not. Before the first barrow came through the gate he asked which part of this was going to be the worst. He was told. Not the mess: the days without a fire, and above all the dinner at noon, there being eleven men to feed at the back end of the harvest.
So he spent three hours on it. He put the old brick oven in the washhouse back into service with a new iron plate across it, about four shillings. He ordered the job so the breast came down on a Wednesday and the fire was drawn again on the Saturday, three days rather than five, at the cost of a trip back on the Sunday. And before a brick was touched he said which three days the fire would be out, and where the other fire would be.
His joints were good. They were not the other man's, and behind that second kitchen's plaster there is a course the first man would have raked out.
Six months later you could have asked in either house. In the first they said he was a very good tradesman who left them a week without a dinner. In the second they said he was no trouble at all. The second man had the parish by the spring.
The Lesson, Since You've Earned It
A customer does not remember the average of a long job. He remembers its worst hour. He remembers it whole, with the feeling still attached, and that is what he hands on to whoever asks him about you.
This is not sentiment, it is how the memory of an episode is built. A fortnight of work is not stored as a fortnight. It is stored as two or three moments, and the one certain to be among them is the extreme. Unremarkable competence leaves no trace at all, which is not the same as leaving a good impression. Nine days of correct work are entered nowhere. The Thursday in the cold kitchen is entered in ink, and still legible when somebody asks her whether she can recommend a man.
Follow that where it leads, because it goes somewhere uncomfortable. The extra care you spread evenly across a job buys you almost nothing, because none of those hours was ever going to be remembered, and ten per cent better than unremembered is still unremembered. The same effort spent entirely on the one bad morning changes the whole account of you. Improvement is not spread. It is aimed.
There is a fair objection and it deserves an answer. Surely a job done well throughout beats a job done unevenly. Yes, as work. We are not discussing the work, we are discussing the record, and the record is kept by somebody who cannot judge your mortar and can judge a Thursday perfectly well. The first bricklayer was not wrong to care about his joints. He was wrong to think his joints were where he was being assessed. It is the same confusion that makes the last ten minutes of a job worth more than the three days before them, and that makes saying in advance what each day will be like a separate piece of work from doing the work.
Two cautions. The first is that the worst hour is his and not yours, and if you guess it you will guess wrongly. Your worst hour is the hardest labour, the Saturday you lost. His may be a cold kitchen, a cart across his gate at eight, a dog that cannot be let out, a day off work he did not know he would have to take. You must ask, and the asking takes a minute.
The second is that none of this is licence to let the rest slide. The rule holds only while the rest is unremarkable. A job with four bad mornings in it has no worst hour, it has a character, and nothing done on the fifth morning will touch it. Aimed effort is what you do once the ordinary standard is met, not instead of it.
Three questions, for the week in front of you:
- Which hour of my ordinary job is the worst one for the customer? Not the hardest hour for you. Ask the next three people you work for, before you start, in those words, and write down what they say.
- What would it take to make that hour ordinary? Rarely money. Usually an arrangement: a thing borrowed, a different order of work, an hour's notice, a stove in a washhouse. Four shillings against a nine pound job is the cheapest thing you will buy this year.
- Where is my extra care going at present? If it goes where nobody will ever see or feel it, it is a gift you are making to yourself, which is permitted, but stop calling it service and stop expecting it to be repaid.
The Answer to the Riddle
Which of them understood what a household actually keeps?
The second, and he bought it for four shillings and a Sunday morning. Both kitchens got a sound flue. Only one of the two knew the flue was not what was being weighed, and that nine days of being correct would be written off against a single Thursday nobody had been warned about.
The verse:
Nine days of mortar laid true,
and not one of them stays in the mind,
but the morning the grate stood cold
is the whole of the week they will find.
Until next time. Go and ask your next customer which part of the job he is dreading, and write his answer in the book before you start.
The Best Time for Trying was Yesterday...
Ben B. Tilley
P.S. There is a cheaper version of the same remedy, needed because some bad hours cannot be removed at any price. A hardship a man was warned of on the Monday is a smaller thing by the Thursday than the same hardship arriving unannounced. Half of what made that kitchen unbearable was not the cold grate but not knowing how many more mornings of it there would be. When you cannot take the worst hour away, name it, date it, and name the hour it ends.
Also in the archive: The Last Twenty Minutes, The Smear on the Hall Paint and The Peg in the Wet Corner.

